public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Ron Johnson <[email protected]>
To: pgsql-generallists.postgresql.org <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Index corruption issue after migration from RHEL 7 to RHEL 9 (PostgreSQL 11 streaming replication)
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2025 10:39:35 -0400
Message-ID: <CANzqJaBKEBX9qb_KZpEWem=Os4qz_ASSSKUxeLACxz4anLW-Bg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <CAJ4rSwspyYBppQS701C=BVFX2yrP1JErgDCZXbC15BQh2zAS1Q@mail.gmail.com>
<CAKAnmmK47O_rYDB4iPe=K3QiqzJcCnnxCoYs_40Q1YWb=x0nDg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAJ4rSwvsRJhwfuem0vsws1WwRZPN8Ju2Nw0e0Oc2j7n=MXUhMg@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAKAnmmLDfgYRX8oC6S7jKZyovv6wy72Twq6-hx315GKTowMjew@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CANzqJaBq3hcAUXhSi5ar0=Gw0QxqfmD_E47dxHAex9_D3Yv-WA@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAApHDvo5pLSwD4JVxW8t94Vc88djKrrSyrL-GbQJ=hb2NVT5zg@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAApHDvq5-7UO1PZBcizg13_ptE0mP=iKwFKUHqhKjwTmS6YR-A@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAApHDvozYU11A7T5XxrzajA6-rqrzRZXfbtToAOu+U_S-Btj=g@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
On Sat, Oct 25, 2025 at 10:21 AM Adrian Klaver <[email protected]>
wrote:
> On 10/24/25 21:50, David Rowley wrote:
> > On Sat, 25 Oct 2025 at 17:36, Adrian Klaver <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> I am not following, from your previous post:
> >>
> >> "Beta versions are meant for test instances. It'd be
> >> good if people encouraged their use more often rather than pushing
> >> people to defer til GA"
> >>
> >> That seems to be the opposite of what you say above.
> >
> > I think you think that because you misunderstood what I said in [1].
> > I'll rephrase it for you:
> >
> > Because people promote the .0 as not yet production-ready, it means
> > that fewer people bother testing with beta and RC versions. Lack of
> > beta testing is what causes .0 to contain more bugs than it otherwise
> > might, so my suggestion is that we should be encouraging people to run
> > beta and RC in their test environments to try to increase the
> > stability of .0 versions.
>
> Alright that I understand, though not necessarily agree with. I would
> say lack of testing has more to do with time/money management.
> Organizations don't want to spend either until: 1) They see the dust
> settle on what is going to end up in the release. 2) Whether there is
> anything interesting enough to invest both in moving to a new release.
> Maybe there is a compelling argument that can be made to get those
> organizations off the fence. I just don't what it is as you would have
> to convince them to spend time and money rather then just wait and let
> the community as a whole do the work.\
>
Contractual requirements to not run EOL software are a strong motivator to
migrate to newer versions of OS and RDBMS.
--
Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
<Redacted> lobster!
view thread (21+ messages)
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Index corruption issue after migration from RHEL 7 to RHEL 9 (PostgreSQL 11 streaming replication)
In-Reply-To: <CANzqJaBKEBX9qb_KZpEWem=Os4qz_ASSSKUxeLACxz4anLW-Bg@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox