public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedRe: failure to drop table due to pg_temp_7 schema
2+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]
* Re: failure to drop table due to pg_temp_7 schema
@ 2025-11-15 16:06 Adrian Klaver <[email protected]>
2025-11-15 18:10 ` Re: failure to drop table due to pg_temp_7 schema Peter 'PMc' Much <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Klaver @ 2025-11-15 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter 'PMc' Much <[email protected]>; [email protected]; +Cc: [email protected]
On 11/15/25 06:57, Peter 'PMc' Much wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Que is this: https://github.com/que-rb/que
Personally I would be more worried about an application
where the last commit was:
Changelog: Add entry for version 2.4.1
committed
on Oct 27, 2024.
Makes you wonder what will happen if you upgrade to a newer version
of Postgres?
> cheers,
> PMc
>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
[email protected]
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: failure to drop table due to pg_temp_7 schema
2025-11-15 16:06 Re: failure to drop table due to pg_temp_7 schema Adrian Klaver <[email protected]>
@ 2025-11-15 18:10 ` Peter 'PMc' Much <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Peter 'PMc' Much @ 2025-11-15 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adrian Klaver <[email protected]>; +Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
On Sat, Nov 15, 2025 at 08:06:22AM -0800, Adrian Klaver wrote:
! On 11/15/25 06:57, Peter 'PMc' Much wrote:
! >
! > Hi,
!
! > Que is this: https://github.com/que-rb/que
!
! Personally I would be more worried about an application
! where the last commit was:
!
! Changelog: Add entry for version 2.4.1
! committed
! on Oct 27, 2024.
Really? I'd call that quite recently.
And there is an explanation: Rails has dropped automated support
for Que. That doesn't matter to me, because I'm not using it in the
automated fashion. But it means the big user base is gone, and
therewith the influx of improvement desires.
! Makes you wonder what will happen if you upgrade to a newer version
! of Postgres?
I'll see when I'm there. Still have to wait for the new kerberos in
FreeBSD - there will be a lot more to mangle anyway.
But speaking generally, I am quite bewildered that a simple tool
being stable for a year might already be considered worrisome.
Normally, a new technology brings a vast amount of innovation for
the first or second decade, and then it starts to stabilize.
We in the IT do the opposite, we ever increase the change rate,
and I am wondering where this is supposed to lead.
cheers,
PMc
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-11-15 18:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-11-15 16:06 Re: failure to drop table due to pg_temp_7 schema Adrian Klaver <[email protected]>
2025-11-15 18:10 ` Peter 'PMc' Much <[email protected]>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox