public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feeddblink Future support vs FDW
2+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]
* dblink Future support vs FDW
@ 2024-06-27 15:32 Dhritman Roy <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dhritman Roy @ 2024-06-27 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Hello,
This is my attempt to seek support at PostGreSQL.
So, if I have broken any protocols/rules or violated any code of conduct then please do forgive and guide me. Thanks.
My organization is building something which is using dblink and what we are building shall take several months and then to be offered to a client.
I just wanted to check what is the future/roadmap of dblink?
Is it going to be obsolete/removed from PostGreSQL in upcoming versions?
I know we can use FDW but our teams are right now considering dblink ( it seems it is more performant when compared to FDW ) and we obviously do not want to end up in a situation where we develop something in few months and then we find that the PostGreSQL support is ending with a new version.
Any information/pointers related to future of dblink will be very useful for us and highly appreciated.
Regards
ROY.
________________________________
The information transmitted herein is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: dblink Future support vs FDW
@ 2024-06-27 17:08 Adrian Klaver <[email protected]>
parent: Dhritman Roy <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Klaver @ 2024-06-27 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dhritman Roy <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>
On 6/27/24 08:32, Dhritman Roy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is my attempt to seek support at PostGreSQL.
>
> I know we can use FDW but our teams are right now considering dblink (
> it seems it is more performant when compared to FDW ) and we obviously
> do not want to end up in a situation where we develop something in few
> months and then we find that the PostGreSQL support is ending with a new
> version.
I would say that is highly unlikely. Even if it where to happen at some
point in the distant future you still have:
https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=tree;f=contrib/dblink;h=03de20165973a346e2ce8e...
Open source code under a permissive license that you could keep running
with.
>
> Any information/pointers related to future of dblink will be very useful
> for us and highly appreciated.
>
> Regards
>
> ROY.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The information transmitted herein is intended only for the person or
> entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential,
> proprietary and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission,
> dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon,
> this information by persons or entities other than the intended
> recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact
> the sender and delete the material from any computer.
>
--
Adrian Klaver
[email protected]
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-06-27 17:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-06-27 15:32 dblink Future support vs FDW Dhritman Roy <[email protected]>
2024-06-27 17:08 ` Adrian Klaver <[email protected]>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox