From: Andreas Kretschmer <andreas@a-kretschmer.de>
To: Luca Ferrari <fluca1978@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: pg_receivexlog or archive_command
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 13:56:47 +0200
Message-ID: <e3ebc4bb-247e-bfcf-21e0-96cdcf633376@a-kretschmer.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKoxK+7JmSyOEC+uOixzj4HG5R4gdhFXUe6+DwavSzMLTVLWsg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAN6gwKwx865jv0fqc7SfwsG3utPhSoFF_tFaptcoDUW+T0uP8w@mail.gmail.com>
<57a86418-1841-89e0-d53b-dad445972169@a-kretschmer.de>
<CAKoxK+7JmSyOEC+uOixzj4HG5R4gdhFXUe6+DwavSzMLTVLWsg@mail.gmail.com>
Am 23.09.19 um 13:44 schrieb Luca Ferrari:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 10:55 AM Andreas Kretschmer
> <andreas@a-kretschmer.de> wrote:
>> you can use both of them, and you should consider "Barman".
> If I remember well Barman uses pg_receivexlog when streaming, and
> archive_command when doing a "normal" backup.
Barman < version 2 can only archive_command, version 2 and higher can both.
> Also pgbackrest is another good tool for backup.
> The idea here should be not reinventing the wheel.
ack.
Regards, Andreas
> --
> 2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company.
> www.2ndQuadrant.com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Cc: andreas@a-kretschmer.de, fluca1978@gmail.com, pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pg_receivexlog or archive_command
In-Reply-To: <e3ebc4bb-247e-bfcf-21e0-96cdcf633376@a-kretschmer.de>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox