From: Robert B. Easter <reaster@comptechnews.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO)
Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 18:25:57 -0400
Message-ID: <00052018353302.14806@comptechnews> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0005201507330.423-100000@localhost.localdomain>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0005201507330.423-100000@localhost.localdomain>
On Sat, 20 May 2000, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> UNDER <supertable>, <supertable>, ...
The standard is very confusing, I am probably wrong, but I didn't see the
syntax for allowing more than one <supertable clause> after the UNDER keyword.
Did Oracle approve ANSI-ISO-9075? I didn't notice them listed anywhere. 9075
is the SQL3 standard right? (or else I'm reading the wrong stuff!!) :)
--
Robert B. Easter
reaster@comptechnews.com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: reaster@comptechnews.com, peter_e@gmx.net
Subject: Re: Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO)
In-Reply-To: <00052018353302.14806@comptechnews>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox