pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Fix for FETCH FIRST syntax problems
Date: Sun, 20 May 2018 01:27:30 +0200
Message-ID: <03da97fc-9d6b-cbe1-c28f-cee7c1ba5c38@2ndquadrant.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22981.1526770675@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <877enz476l.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk>
	<22981.1526770675@sss.pgh.pa.us>

On 20/05/18 00:57, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes:
>> Attached is a draft patch for fixing that, which additionally fixes the
>> ugly wart that OFFSET <x> ROW/ROWS and FETCH FIRST [<x>] ROW/ROWS ONLY
>> had very different productions for <x>; both now accept c_expr there.
> 
> LGTM, except please s/presense/presence/ in grammar comment.
> Also, why'd you back off "must write" to "should write" in the docs?
> This doesn't make the parens any more optional than before.

It certainly does.  It allows this now:

PREPARE foo AS TABLE bar FETCH FIRST $1 ROWS ONLY;

>> I think a case can be made that this should be backpatched; thoughts?
> 
> Meh, -0.5.  This is not really a bug, because it's operating as designed.
> You've found a reasonably painless way to improve the grammar, which is
> great, but it seems more like a feature addition than a bug fix.
> 
> I'd be fine with sneaking this into v11, though.
I'm +1 for backpatching it.  It may be operating as designed by PeterE
ten years ago, but it's not operating as designed by the SQL standard.
-- 
Vik Fearing                                          +33 6 46 75 15 36
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support




view thread (19+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <03da97fc-9d6b-cbe1-c28f-cee7c1ba5c38@2ndquadrant.com>
Permalink:  ../03da97fc-9d6b-cbe1-c28f-cee7c1ba5c38@2ndquadrant.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/03da97fc-9d6b-cbe1-c28f-cee7c1ba5c38@2ndquadrant.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: vik.fearing@2ndquadrant.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk
  Subject: Re: Fix for FETCH FIRST syntax problems
  In-Reply-To: <03da97fc-9d6b-cbe1-c28f-cee7c1ba5c38@2ndquadrant.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox