public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
To: Jacob Champion <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Document use of ldapurl with LDAP simple bind
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 10:37:36 +0200
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOYmi+m1xrWwGyOUPopQvYgOyPJa+TYAq3uZ09MmgkZq6RmCKA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOYmi+nyg9gE0LeP=xQ3AgyQGR=5ZZMkVVbWd0uR8XQmg_dd5Q@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAOYmi+m1xrWwGyOUPopQvYgOyPJa+TYAq3uZ09MmgkZq6RmCKA@mail.gmail.com>
On 08.07.24 23:27, Jacob Champion wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 12:11 AM Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> wrote:
>> This appears to imply that specifying ldapurl is only applicable for
>> search+bind. Maybe that whole message should be simplified to something
>> like
>>
>> "configuration mixes arguments for simple bind and search+bind"
>>
>> (The old wording also ignores that the error might arise via "ldapsuffix".)
>
> I kept the imperative "cannot" and tried to match the terminology with
> our documentation at [1]:
>
> cannot mix options for simple bind and search+bind modes
Committed.
(I suppose this could be considered a bug fix, but I don't feel an
urgency to go backpatching this. Let me know if there are different
opinions.)
view thread (2+ messages)
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Document use of ldapurl with LDAP simple bind
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox