From: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: Sandro Santilli <strk@kbt.io>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Regina Obe <lr@pcorp.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 10:35:25 -0700
Message-ID: <0b93be9554c21abfe9571ea9243fa5aa196d9200.camel@j-davis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <05ad2b39-3d0f-e0aa-e0a3-086b998a26e8@enterprisedb.com>
References: <20230509082553.yjikrxn54mi6hezc@alvherre.pgsql>
<05ad2b39-3d0f-e0aa-e0a3-086b998a26e8@enterprisedb.com>
On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 13:07 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Here is my proposed patch for this.
The commit message makes it sound like lc_collate/ctype are completely
obsolete, and I don't think that's quite right: they still represent
the server environment, which does still matter in some cases.
I'd just say that they are too confusing (likely to be misused), and
becoming obsolete (or less relevant), or something along those lines.
Otherwise, this is fine with me. I didn't do a detailed review because
it's just mechanical.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql@j-davis.com, peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com, alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, strk@kbt.io, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, lr@pcorp.us, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction
In-Reply-To: <0b93be9554c21abfe9571ea9243fa5aa196d9200.camel@j-davis.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox