From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Return of the Solaris vacuum polling problem -- anyone remember this?
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:15:34 -0400
Message-ID: <10189.1282590934@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201008231855.o7NItt310271@momjian.us>
References: <201008231855.o7NItt310271@momjian.us>
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> OK, I have attached a proposed patch to improve this. I moved the
> pg_clog mention to a new paragraph and linked it to the reason the
> default is relatively low.
The references to "vacuum freeze" are incorrect; autovacuum does NOT
do the equivalent of VACUUM FREEZE. Please stop playing around with
the perfectly good existing wording.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, bruce@momjian.us, alvherre@commandprompt.com, josh@agliodbs.com
Subject: Re: Return of the Solaris vacuum polling problem -- anyone remember this?
In-Reply-To: <10189.1282590934@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox