From: Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
To: ow <oneway_111@yahoo.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Subject: Re: Are we losing momentum?
Date: 15 Apr 2003 16:27:07 -0400
Message-ID: <1050438427.368.37.camel@tokyo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030415193518.14217.qmail@web21414.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <20030415193518.14217.qmail@web21414.mail.yahoo.com>
On Tue, 2003-04-15 at 15:35, ow wrote:
> Some databases contain lots of data, e.g. dbs that contain historical
> data. No one wants to have one HUGE db that runs all company's apps,
> takes hours (if not days) to recover and when this huge db goes down
> none of the apps is available.
Are you talking about queries between databases on the same postmaster
(i.e. running under the same PostgreSQL installation), or queries
between postmasters running on different systems? If the former, I don't
see how putting your data into multiple schemas in a single database is
significantly less reliable than putting it into multiple databases.
Cheers,
Neil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: neilc@samurai.com, oneway_111@yahoo.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
Subject: Re: Are we losing momentum?
In-Reply-To: <1050438427.368.37.camel@tokyo>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox