pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@postgresql.org>
Cc: Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: jim@nasby.net, "pgsql-general@postgresql.org" <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SAP and MySQL ... [and Benchmark]
Date: 13 Jun 2003 18:03:06 -0400
Message-ID: <1055541786.7392.567.camel@camel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030613180809.F27289@hub.org>
References: <200306111624.h5BGOHe06484@candle.pha.pa.us>
	<28061.1055480935@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<1055514791.7070.461.camel@camel>
	<200306131210.58564.lamar.owen@wgcr.org>
	<1055527096.7086.504.camel@camel>
	<20030613180809.F27289@hub.org>

On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 17:16, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Robert Treat wrote:
> > i think the disconnect here is that in the past all aspects of marketing
> > postgresql have been made by the technical guys.  now you have a group
> > of people who want to change the way that things are done and if the new
> > people's decisions are going to override the previous policies that were
> > put in place, we need some form acceptance of that and the folks who i
> > see giving that acceptance is the core group. The press releases fall
> > into this category, since the current standard is that we don't make
> > announcements of "point" releases, but the advocacy group is recognizing
> > that something could be gained from spreading the word to right right
> > target audiences. Should we just go and do it?  I guess based on Tom's
> > post we should.
> 
> I think so too ... but, just curious ... we generally mention something on
> -hackers at least a week before we do any point releases ... shouldn't
> that be enough time to throw together a press release so that the release
> doesn't have to be delayed?  same with major releases, there is such a
> long, drawn out beta period before that, where features are frozen ...
> shouldn't there be enough time in there to make one helluva powerful press
> release?
>

I don't want to go into a detailed rehash of the releases, but out of
the last few we've had releases that were wrapped and/or packaged and
announcements sent out to the mailing lists and there was either no
mention on the websites, issues with the ftp mirrors, or no press
releases given. I know for 7.3.3 the actual release date got bumped
around enough I felt unsure when it came to reporting the release status
in the weekly news. 

Right now I believe there are two "release process" documents floating
around, one by the advocacy group, and one in the cvs.  We'll see how
well they work for the next release.

Robert Treat  
-- 
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL




view thread (39+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <1055541786.7392.567.camel@camel>
Permalink:  ../1055541786.7392.567.camel@camel/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/1055541786.7392.567.camel@camel

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: xzilla@users.sourceforge.net, scrappy@postgresql.org, lamar.owen@wgcr.org, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, justin@postgresql.org, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SAP and MySQL ... [and Benchmark]
  In-Reply-To: <1055541786.7392.567.camel@camel>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox