From: Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
To: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Subject: Re: row-level stats and last analyze time
Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 14:20:19 -0400
Message-ID: <1178216419.18303.12.camel@goldbach> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1177625227.6440.61.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <462B6CEB.4010109@lelarge.info>
<1177450739.16415.249.camel@localhost.localdomain>
<1177625227.6440.61.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Thu, 2007-26-04 at 18:07 -0400, Neil Conway wrote:
> (1) I believe the reasoning for Tom's earlier change was not to reduce
> the I/O between the backend and the pgstat process [...]
Tom, any comments on this? Your change introduced an undocumented
regression into 8.2. I think you're on the hook for a documentation
update at the very least, if not a revert.
-Neil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: neilc@samurai.com, guillaume@lelarge.info, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
Subject: Re: row-level stats and last analyze time
In-Reply-To: <1178216419.18303.12.camel@goldbach>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox