pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Performance improvement for joins where outer side is unique
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 15:21:39 -0400
Message-ID: <12499.1460056899@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160407190214.GA569221@alvherre.pgsql>
References: <20160407190214.GA569221@alvherre.pgsql>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I don't know if you have time to look at this now --- my clock says it's
>> already Friday morning in New Zealand.

> FWIW the feature freeze rules state that it is allowed for a committer
> to request an extension to the feature freeze date for individual
> patches:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BTgmoY56w5FOzeEo%2Bi48qehL%2BBsVTwy-Q1M0xjUhUCwgGW7-Q%40ma...
> It seems to me that the restrictions laid out there are well met for
> this patch, if you only need a couple of additional days for this patch
> to get in.

Hmm ... the changes I'm thinking about here are certainly pretty
mechanical, if tedious.  The main question mark I have hanging over
this patch is whether the planning-time penalty is too large --- but
that's something that can be tested with the patch as it stands.
Let me go investigate that a bit before requesting an extension.

			regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers



view thread (131+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <12499.1460056899@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../12499.1460056899@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/12499.1460056899@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com, tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com, simon@2ndquadrant.com
  Subject: Re: Performance improvement for joins where outer side is unique
  In-Reply-To: <12499.1460056899@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox