pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Cc: Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
Cc: Nikita Glukhov <n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Error-safe user functions
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2022 09:20:27 -0500
Message-ID: <1260231.1670682027@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221210122013.swbpo63go6ty2fcn@alvherre.pgsql>
References: <20221210122013.swbpo63go6ty2fcn@alvherre.pgsql>

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> On 2022-Dec-09, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ...  So I think it might be
>> okay to say "if you want soft error treatment for a domain,
>> make sure its check constraints don't throw errors".

> I think that's fine.  If the user does, say "CHECK (value > 0)" and that
> results in a soft error, that seems to me enough support for now.  If
> they want to do something more elaborate, they can write C functions.
> Maybe eventually we'll want to offer some other mechanism that doesn't
> require C, but let's figure out what the requirements are.  I don't
> think we know that, at this point.

A fallback we can offer to anyone with such a problem is "write a
plpgsql function and wrap the potentially-failing bit in an exception
block".  Then they get to pay the cost of the subtransaction, while
we're not imposing one on everybody else.

			regards, tom lane





view thread (175+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <1260231.1670682027@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../1260231.1670682027@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/1260231.1670682027@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, andrew@dunslane.net, andres@anarazel.de, aekorotkov@gmail.com, robertmhaas@gmail.com, david.g.johnston@gmail.com, corey.huinker@gmail.com, mail@joeconway.com, n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: Error-safe user functions
  In-Reply-To: <1260231.1670682027@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox