public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
To: Tomas Vondra <[email protected]>
Cc: Andres Freund <[email protected]>
Cc: Fujii Masao <[email protected]>
Cc: Robert Haas <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw: using TABLESAMPLE to collect remote sample
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 15:27:56 -0400
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<CA+TgmoYx596-mqUP=xf0DdQ97UERxXfzhR0Otpa411sGV1vKow@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CA+TgmobqyX6s2VQ0=HGZc4xW+tOusPa0FLfSevH_PA2Kum34BA@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
Tomas Vondra <[email protected]> writes:
> I we want to improve sampling for partitioned cases (where the foreign
> table is just one of many partitions), I think we'd have to rework how
> we determine sample size for each partition. Now we simply calculate
> that from relpages, which seems quite fragile (different amounts of
> bloat, different tuple densities) and somewhat strange for FDW serves
> that don't use the same "page" concept.
> So it may easily happen we determine bogus sample sizes for each
> partition. The difficulties when calculating the sample_frac is just a
> secondary issue.
> OTOH the concept of a "row" seems way more general, so perhaps
> acquire_inherited_sample_rows should use reltuples, and if we want to do
> correction it should happen at this stage already.
Yeah, there's definitely something to be said for changing that to be
based on rowcount estimates instead of physical size. I think it's
a matter for a different patch though, and not a reason to hold up
this one.
regards, tom lane
view thread (29+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw: using TABLESAMPLE to collect remote sample
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox