From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Let's stop with the retail rebuilds of src/port/ files already
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 19:10:40 -0400
Message-ID: <13022.1538003440@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
I'm getting tired of having to make fixes like ce4887bd0. I think
we should rearrange things so that src/port/ and src/common/ compile
all their files a third time using shared-library-friendly switches,
put them into new .a files, and have libpq and the ecpg libraries
just include those libraries instead of what they're doing now.
This would result in compiling some of the port+common files uselessly,
since they'd never actually get pulled in by any shared library.
But I think we're approaching the point where we might have a net savings
of build time anyway, due to not having to compile the same files multiple
times in different subdirectories. And it'd sure be a savings of
developer brain-cells and sanity.
Maybe use the extension "_shlib" (vs "_srv") for these .o and .a files.
Thoughts?
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Let's stop with the retail rebuilds of src/port/ files already
In-Reply-To: <13022.1538003440@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox