From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Elvis Pranskevichus <el@prans.net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow anonymous rowtypes in function return column definition
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 19:26:27 -0500
Message-ID: <14796.1548894387@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5580575.Bn2KaDtcXf@hammer.magicstack.net>
References: <11038447.kQ5A9Uj5xi@hammer.magicstack.net>
<1691096.MngoxCRQ0q@hammer.magicstack.net>
<19439.1548889181@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<5580575.Bn2KaDtcXf@hammer.magicstack.net>
Elvis Pranskevichus <el@prans.net> writes:
> On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 5:59:41 PM EST Tom Lane wrote:
>> I still found this pretty disjointed. After a bit of thought I
>> propose the attached reformulation, which has the callers just tell
>> the routines which types to allow explicitly, with the justification
>> comments living at the call sites instead of within the routines.
> This is a much better formulation, thank you!
OK, pushed.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, el@prans.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow anonymous rowtypes in function return column definition
In-Reply-To: <14796.1548894387@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox