pg.ddx.io pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feed From: legrand legrand <legrand_legrand@hotmail.com>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store)
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 13:36:08 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <1553718968249-0.post@n3.nabble.com> (raw )
In-Reply-To: <CAOBaU_aX2Ad_pcSWGUQ1YFk8gotwoMYJDg5Wmosh7jj+28AQ4w@mail.gmail.com >
References: <DB6PR0301MB21352F6210E3B11934B0DCC790B00@DB6PR0301MB2135.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com >
<6112091549979517@myt5-a323eb993ef7.qloud-c.yandex.net >
<1550179299067-0.post@n3.nabble.com >
<2205341550215950@sas1-cd55e40a6ba0.qloud-c.yandex.net >
<DB6PR0301MB2135B4B1D256F547966A559B90430@DB6PR0301MB2135.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com >
<CAOBaU_Yq6motvaqXE_vBWf=SsRANij=+jE3Xa4qCmzGb24LkzA@mail.gmail.com >
<DB6PR0301MB21351B7CDA68EFE4838562EC905C0@DB6PR0301MB2135.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com >
<CAOBaU_bU1m3_XF5qKYtSj1ua4dxd=FWDyh2SH4rSJAUUfsGmAQ@mail.gmail.com >
<DB6PR0301MB2135B8CE071A02D2D663CFA1905F0@DB6PR0301MB2135.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com >
<CAOBaU_aX2Ad_pcSWGUQ1YFk8gotwoMYJDg5Wmosh7jj+28AQ4w@mail.gmail.com >
>> - trailing whitespaces and comments wider than 80 characters
>> not fixed
> why? In case it's not clear, I'm talking about the .c file, not the
> regression tests.
I work on a poor msys install on windows 7, where perl is broken ;o(
So no pgindent available.
Will fix that later, or as soon as I get a pgindent diff.
>> - "Assert(planning_time > 0 && total_time > 0);"
>> moved at the beginning of pgss_store
> Have you tried to actually compile postgres and pg_stat_statements
> with --enable-cassert? This test can *never* be true, since you
> either provide the planning time or the execution time or neither. As
> I said in my previous mail, adding a parameter to say which counter
> you're updating, instead of adding another counter that's mutually
> exclusive with the other would make everything clearer.
Yes this "assert" is useless as is ... I'll remove it.
I understand you proposal of pgss_store refactoring, but I don't have
much time available now ... and I would like to check that performances
are not broken before any other modification ...
Regards
PAscal
--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-hackers-f1928748.html
view thread (127+ messages) latest in thread
Message-ID: <1553718968249-0.post@n3.nabble.com>
Permalink: ../1553718968249-0.post@n3.nabble.com/
Also on: postgresql.org/message-id/1553718968249-0.post@n3.nabble.com
copy link · copy postgr.es
reply Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: legrand_legrand@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store)
In-Reply-To: <1553718968249-0.post@n3.nabble.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox