pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Cc: Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name>
Subject: Re: Regression with large XML data input
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 23:28:38 -0400
Message-ID: <1569825.1753327718@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aIGknLuc8b8ega2X@paquier.xyz>
References: <aIGknLuc8b8ega2X@paquier.xyz>

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> A customer has reported a regression with the parsing of rather large
> XML data, introduced by the set of backpatches done with f68d6aabb7e2
> & friends.

Bleah.

> Switching back to the previous code, where we rely on
> xmlParseBalancedChunkMemory() fixes the issue.

Yeah, just reverting these commits might be an acceptable answer,
since the main point was to work around a bleeding-edge bug:

>> * Early 2.13.x releases of libxml2 contain a bug that causes
>> xmlParseBalancedChunkMemory to return the wrong status value in some
>> cases.  This breaks our regression tests.  While that bug is now fixed
>> upstream and will probably never be seen in any production-oriented
>> distro, it is currently a problem on some more-bleeding-edge-friendly
>> platforms.

Presumably that problem is now gone, a year later.  The other point
about

>> * xmlParseBalancedChunkMemory is considered to depend on libxml2's
>> semi-deprecated SAX1 APIs, and will go away when and if they do.

is still hypothetical I think.  But we might want to keep this bit:

>> While here, avoid allocating an xmlParserCtxt in DOCUMENT parse mode,
>> since that code path is not going to use it.

			regards, tom lane





view thread (36+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <1569825.1753327718@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../1569825.1753327718@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/1569825.1753327718@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, michael@paquier.xyz, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, ewie@ewie.name
  Subject: Re: Regression with large XML data input
  In-Reply-To: <1569825.1753327718@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox