From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Magnus Hagander <mha@sollentuna.net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: SSL patch
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 12:40:30 -0400
Message-ID: <1743.932834430@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <215896B6B5E1CF11BC5600805FFEA82101F70B70@sirius.edu.sollentuna.se>
Magnus Hagander <mha@sollentuna.net> writes:
> As it is right now, it should work in all combinations except a 6.6 client
> compiled with SSL support connecting to a pre-6.6 server. It already
> falls-back if the server is 6.6 (without SSL support). And the 6.6 client
> compiled without SSL works.
Actually, it shouldn't matter whether the server is 6.6-without-SSL
or pre-6.6. At least in the way I envisioned it, they'd act the same.
> There is not yet a way in the client to specify that SSL connection is
> required (it can be specified on the server). I'm planning to put that in,
> but I thought it would be good to get the "base code" approved first - which
> proved to be a good thing :-)
> I'll see if I can wrap something up before I leave on vacation (leaving
> pretty soon, be gone about a week). Not sure I'll make it, though. Should I
> do this as a patch against what I have now, or keep sending in "the one big
> patch"?
I don't think anyone has applied your patch yet, so why don't you just
resubmit the whole thing after cleaning up the loose ends.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, mha@sollentuna.net
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: SSL patch
In-Reply-To: <1743.932834430@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox