public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
To: Daria Shanina <[email protected]>
Cc: Robert Haas <[email protected]>
Cc: Melanie Plageman <[email protected]>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: autoprewarm_dump_now
Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 09:21:48 -0400
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMp4U1c8S7oTsuNahvkFLR7OeSxnamtOHgey=rcMi=Y7cWg7ng@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMp4U1cDJzb96KJXT-hNuf7L4KaYUiXWs6KSe01so--mBoop8g@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAAKRu_YyuqbRaVO-zkoeRLFeNtF_jX-faGSGH4h3JB6ckORWMg@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+TgmobRMXwFg4AUZ96FvXALFkN8H7KBqhCp-CtMS83RuKXG3A@mail.gmail.com>
<CAMp4U1c8S7oTsuNahvkFLR7OeSxnamtOHgey=rcMi=Y7cWg7ng@mail.gmail.com>
Daria Shanina <[email protected]> writes:
> I have made a patch, now we can allocate more than 1 GB of memory for the
> autoprewarm_dump_now function.
Is that solving a real-world problem? If it is, shouldn't we be
looking for a different approach that doesn't require such a huge
amount of memory?
regards, tom lane
view thread (15+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: autoprewarm_dump_now
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox