From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 10:52:59 -0400
Message-ID: <19227.1586875979@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <97111ed7-0027-2e76-a899-910c3373ec44@proxel.se>
References: <8691.1586798003@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<6c7e5aff-3cb1-ce29-c2f5-0074703555f6@proxel.se>
<18165.1586874544@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<97111ed7-0027-2e76-a899-910c3373ec44@proxel.se>
Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se> writes:
> That said, I agree with that quite many of our tables right now are
> ugly, but I prefer ugly to hard to read. For me the mix of having every
> third row split into two fields makes the tables very hard to read. I
> have a hard time seeing which rows belong to which function.
Did you look at the variants without that discussed downthread?
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, andreas@proxel.se, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
In-Reply-To: <19227.1586875979@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox