From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, Hadi Moshayedi <hadi@moshayedi.net>
Subject: Re: tableam scan-API patch broke foreign key validation
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2019 14:13:29 -0400
Message-ID: <19246.1554574409@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <FD203188-892D-4FD6-99F4-7E85027B60A7@anarazel.de>
References: <19030.1554574075@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<FD203188-892D-4FD6-99F4-7E85027B60A7@anarazel.de>
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On April 6, 2019 11:07:55 AM PDT, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I plan to go ahead and commit Hadi's fix with that change included
>> (as below), but I wonder whether anything else needs to be revisited.
> I posted pretty much that patch nearby, with some other questions. Was waiting for David to respond.... Let me dig that out.
Ah. Would you rather I wait till you push yours?
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, andres@anarazel.de, hadi@moshayedi.net
Subject: Re: tableam scan-API patch broke foreign key validation
In-Reply-To: <19246.1554574409@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox