pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: shridhar@frodo.hserus.net, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 14:05:16 +0100
Message-ID: <20040215130516.GA5939@deneb.enyo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3593.1075998120@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <46C15C39FEB2C44BA555E356FBCD6FA49620A3@m0114.s-mxs.net>
	<2297.1075992889@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<200402052045.48448.shridhar@frodo.hserus.net>
	<3593.1075998120@sss.pgh.pa.us>

Tom Lane wrote:

> You can only fsync one FD at a time (too bad ... if there were a
> multi-file-fsync API it'd solve the overspecified-write-ordering issue).

What about aio_fsync()?

view thread (31+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20040215130516.GA5939@deneb.enyo.de>
Permalink:  ../20040215130516.GA5939@deneb.enyo.de/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20040215130516.GA5939@deneb.enyo.de

copy link · copy postgr.es

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: fw@deneb.enyo.de, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
  Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint
  In-Reply-To: <20040215130516.GA5939@deneb.enyo.de>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox