pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jim C. Nasby <jnasby@pervasive.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Jonah H. Harris <jonah.harris@gmail.com>
Cc: John DeSoi <desoi@pgedit.com>
Cc: Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Google SoC--Idea Request
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 00:00:18 -0500
Message-ID: <20060425050017.GC81249@pervasive.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9008.1145934318@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <20060417205455.GP49405@pervasive.com>
	<44452F9C.8000401@osdl.org>
	<AB8B2106-EA96-4577-845B-6604CC140AEC@pgedit.com>
	<36e682920604190909p68649a35m1953a7b4262b8852@mail.gmail.com>
	<20060423214524.GC4775@surnet.cl>
	<36e682920604231522w96183d0mbedfd7c70d574b58@mail.gmail.com>
	<20060424165112.GD38186@pervasive.com>
	<8743.1145932591@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<36e682920604241956s2bdd8880q2c479740d893c6fd@mail.gmail.com>
	<9008.1145934318@sss.pgh.pa.us>

On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 11:05:18PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com> writes:
> > While the student could do some benchmarking on relatively new
> > hardware and make suggestions, I agree with Tom.  Having to keep
> > support for older platforms doesn't leave much flexibility to change
> > the defaults.
> 
> Another point here is that the defaults *are* reasonable for development
> and for small installations; the people who are complaining are the ones
> who expect to run terabyte databases without any tuning.  (I exaggerate
> perhaps, but the point is valid.)
> 
> We've talked more than once about offering multiple alternative
> starting-point postgresql.conf files to give people an idea of what to
> do for small/medium/large installations.  MySQL have done that for years
> and it doesn't seem that users are unable to cope with the concept.
> But doing this is (a) mostly a matter of testing and documenting, not
> coding and (b) probably too small for a SoC project anyway.

My recollection was that there was opposition to offering multiple
config files, but that there was a proposal to make initdb smarter about
picking configuration values.

Personally, I agree that multiple config files would be fine. Or a
really fancy solution would be feeding a config option to initdb and
have it generate an appropriate postgresql.conf.
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461



view thread (53+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20060425050017.GC81249@pervasive.com>
Permalink:  ../20060425050017.GC81249@pervasive.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20060425050017.GC81249@pervasive.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: jnasby@pervasive.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, jonah.harris@gmail.com, desoi@pgedit.com
  Subject: Re: Google SoC--Idea Request
  In-Reply-To: <20060425050017.GC81249@pervasive.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox