From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
Cc: Michael Nacos <m.nacos@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Overhauling GUCS
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:25:21 +0300
Message-ID: <200808191225.23039.peter_e@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3447.1219088424@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <7473.1212625397@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<87y72u178j.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com>
<3447.1219088424@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Am Monday, 18. August 2008 schrieb Tom Lane:
> The impression I get every time this comes up is that various people
> have different problems they want to solve that (they think) require
> redesign of the way GUC works. Those complicated solutions arise from
> attempting to satisfy N different demands simultaneously.
Which may be the reason that I have been getting the impression that
the "Problems" and the proposed resolutions on
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/GUCS_Overhaul are not really closely related.
I can agree with the Problems, but then I am lost.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: peter_e@gmx.net, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, stark@enterprisedb.com, gsmith@gregsmith.com, m.nacos@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Overhauling GUCS
In-Reply-To: <200808191225.23039.peter_e@gmx.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox