From: Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
Subject: Re: WAL format changes
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 23:52:04 +0200
Message-ID: <201206142352.04528.andres@2ndquadrant.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FDA5136.6080206@enterprisedb.com>
References: <4FDA5136.6080206@enterprisedb.com>
On Thursday, June 14, 2012 11:01:42 PM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> As I threatened earlier
> (http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4FD0B1AB.3090405@enterprisedb.co
> m), here are three patches that change the WAL format. The goal is to
> change the format so that when you're inserting a WAL record of a given
> size, you know exactly how much space it requires in the WAL.
I fear the patches need rebasing after the pgindent run... Even before that
(60801944fa105252b48ea5688d47dfc05c695042) it only applies with offsets?
Greetings,
Andres
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: andres@2ndquadrant.com, heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com
Subject: Re: WAL format changes
In-Reply-To: <201206142352.04528.andres@2ndquadrant.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox