From: Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: MultiXactId error after upgrade to 9.3.4
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:18:07 +0200
Message-ID: <20140331131807.GC18358@alap3.anarazel.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140331130908.GO4582@tamriel.snowman.net>
References: <20140330040029.GY4582@tamriel.snowman.net>
<20140330141135.GA4582@tamriel.snowman.net>
<20140330185349.GD4582@tamriel.snowman.net>
<20140331115452.GT9567@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org>
<20140331115713.GA18358@alap3.anarazel.de>
<20140331121912.GU9567@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org>
<20140331123030.GB18358@alap3.anarazel.de>
<20140331130215.GV9567@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org>
<20140331130908.GO4582@tamriel.snowman.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>
On 2014-03-31 09:09:08 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Alvaro Herrera (alvherre@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
> > I guess I wasn't expecting that too-old values would last longer than a
> > full wraparound cycle. Maybe the right fix is just to have the second
> > check also conditional on allow_old.
>
> I don't believe this was a wraparound case.
Could you show pg_controldata from the old cluster?
> > Anyway, it's not clear to me why this database has a multixact value of
> > 6 million when the next multixact value is barely above one million.
> > Stephen said a wraparound here is not likely.
>
> I don't think the xmax value is a multixact at all- I think it's
> actually a regular xid, but everyone is expected to ignore it because
> XMAX_IS_INVALID, yet somehow the MULTIXACT bit was also set and the new
> code expects to be able to look at the xmax field even though it's
> marked as invalid..
XMAX_IS_INVALID was never allowed to be ignored for vacuum AFAICS. So I
don't think this is a valid explanation.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: andres@2ndquadrant.com, sfrost@snowman.net, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com
Subject: Re: MultiXactId error after upgrade to 9.3.4
In-Reply-To: <20140331131807.GC18358@alap3.anarazel.de>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox