From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: PQgetssl() and alternative SSL implementations
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 20:19:25 -0400
Message-ID: <20140821001925.GH17822@momjian.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140819194717.GM16422@tamriel.snowman.net>
References: <53F1E989.8020609@vmware.com>
<CA+TgmoZDJ6CKiuBMqNk3iS7LQ9GZuzS7RTYSOvRu8kJjRKWLng@mail.gmail.com>
<CABUevExpTZpMAMvr=BkeO5-XG_zgZP=TKdyCCpgEpYc0Htjr8Q@mail.gmail.com>
<10419.1408475397@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<CABUevEy03OvP3N3wBRVP7BcmwcHf=Qi6Crb2MHo4dVmG--ZnVg@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+TgmoaKHd+HW8kOgzovdSTWhauEsV0qeRsxPLpEZfSNDiSP=g@mail.gmail.com>
<20140819194717.GM16422@tamriel.snowman.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 03:47:17PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote:
> > BTW, if we're beating on libpq, I wonder if we shouldn't consider
> > bumping the soversion at some point. I mean, I know that we
> > technically don't need to do that if we're only *adding* functions and
> > not changing any of the existing stuff in backward-incompatible ways,
> > but we might *want* to make some backward-incompatible changes at some
> > point, and I think there's a decent argument that any patch in this
> > are is already doing that at least to PQgetSSL(). Maybe this would be
> > a good time to think if there's anything else we want to do that
> > would, either by itself or in combination, justify a bump.
>
> I'm not a big fan of doing it for this specific item, though it's
> technically an API breakage (which means we should actually have
> libpq2-dev packages, make everything that build-deps on libpq-dev
> update to build-dep on libpq2-dev, have libpq6, etc..). If there are
> other backwards-incompatible things we wish to do, then I agree that
> it'd be good to do them all at the same time (perhaps in conjunction
> with 10.0...). This is the part where I wish we had been keeping an
> updated list of things we want to change (like on the wiki..).
We have, called "Wire Protocol Changes":
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo
Unfortunately, the subsection link doesn't work on Firefox.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: bruce@momjian.us, sfrost@snowman.net, robertmhaas@gmail.com, magnus@hagander.net, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, hlinnakangas@vmware.com
Subject: Re: PQgetssl() and alternative SSL implementations
In-Reply-To: <20140821001925.GH17822@momjian.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox