pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Cc: pgsql-core <pgsql-core@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [CORE] postpone next week's release
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 15:31:46 -0400
Message-ID: <20150529193146.GI26667@tamriel.snowman.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABUevExb+p3OGFBAMTc2s0tuuygkmnca_BV6Qe0hACvRmgyb1w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+TgmoY-OUbRAqZ7Rgdwb-_CTBbY=fkR93sgPrJaFfR8oojeCw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150529185431.GG26667@tamriel.snowman.net>
	<CABUevExb+p3OGFBAMTc2s0tuuygkmnca_BV6Qe0hACvRmgyb1w@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>

* Magnus Hagander (magnus@hagander.net) wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> 
> > * Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote:
> > > I think we should postpone next week's release.  I have been hard at
> > > work on the multixact-related bugs that were reported in 9.4.2 and
> > > 9.3.7, and the subsequent bugs found by code-reading, but getting them
> > > all fixed by Monday doesn't seem realistic.  Such fixes should have
> > > careful review, and not be dashed into the tree under time pressure.
> > >
> > > We could do the release anyway to relieve the pain caused by the
> > > fsync-pgdata hard-failure problem, but it seems to me that if we do
> > > that, we're just going to end up having to do yet another release
> > > almost right away.  I think it would be better to wait and do one
> > > release that fixes both sets of issues.
> >
> > Agreed.
> >
> > I just caution that we appreciate PGCon coming up and that we do our
> > best to avoid running into a case where we have to push it further due
> > to everyone being at the conference.
> 
> If we plan it, we certainly *can* make a release during pgcon. If that's
> what the reasonable timing comes down to, I think getting these fixes out
> definitely has to be considered more important than the conference, so a
> few of us will just have to take a break...

I don't disagree with you about any of that, just wanted to make mention
of the timing.

	Thanks!

		Stephen

Attachments:

  signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 818B) download

view thread (78+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20150529193146.GI26667@tamriel.snowman.net>
Permalink:  ../20150529193146.GI26667@tamriel.snowman.net/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20150529193146.GI26667@tamriel.snowman.net

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: sfrost@snowman.net, magnus@hagander.net, robertmhaas@gmail.com, pgsql-core@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: [CORE] postpone next week's release
  In-Reply-To: <20150529193146.GI26667@tamriel.snowman.net>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox