From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: YUriy Zhuravlev <u.zhuravlev@postgrespro.ru>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 17:39:26 +0200
Message-ID: <20150828153926.GG4857@alap3.anarazel.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150828153245.GD2912@alvherre.pgsql>
References: <4184974.kkvGJ5GoEX@dinodell>
<20150828153245.GD2912@alvherre.pgsql>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>
On 2015-08-28 12:32:45 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> YUriy Zhuravlev wrote:
> > Hello Hackers
> >
> > How would you react if I provided a patch which introduces a CMake build
> > system?
>
> What's your motivation for doing so?
I definitely can see some advantages. Non-broken dependencies around
recursive make being a major one. But I'm also afraid it's a rather
large undertaking. There's a fair number of special kind of rules, and
we're probably not going to want to break pgxs for extensions.
I also have some doubts around the portability of cmake and it's
generated makefiles. We do support some odd platforms.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: andres@anarazel.de, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, u.zhuravlev@postgrespro.ru
Subject: Re: WIP: About CMake v2
In-Reply-To: <20150828153926.GG4857@alap3.anarazel.de>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox