From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: pgbench stats per script & other stuff
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 13:09:03 +0100
Message-ID: <20160129120903.GA765057@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1601271325140.12620@sto>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>
Fabien COELHO wrote:
> The answer is essentially yes, the field is needed for the "aggregated" mode
> where this specific behavior is used.
OK, thanks, that looks better to me.
Can you now appreciate why I asked for split patches? If I had to go
over the big patch I probably wouldn't have been able to read through
each to make sense of it.
I pushed this, along with a few more tweaks, mostly adding comments and
moving functions so that related things are together. I hope I didn't
break anything.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, coelho@cri.ensmp.fr
Subject: Re: pgbench stats per script & other stuff
In-Reply-To: <20160129120903.GA765057@alvherre.pgsql>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox