pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@2ndQuadrant.com>
Cc: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>
Subject: Re: dealing with extension dependencies that aren't quite 'e'
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 10:58:49 -0300
Message-ID: <20160405135849.GA254264@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160405073857.GA22826@toroid.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>

Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
> At 2016-04-05 12:33:56 +0530, ams@2ndQuadrant.com wrote:
> >
> > Álvaro: I did document and test the extra types you added, but now
> > that I think about it a bit more, it's hard to argue that it's useful
> > to have a table, for example, depend on an extension. There's really
> > nothing about a table that "doesn't work without" an extension.
> 
> I think it makes sense to implement this for triggers and functions. It
> may also be useful for indexes and materialised views, which can refer
> to functions in an extension (and in future, sequences as well).
> 
> It's certainly good to know the grammar would work if we wanted to add
> other object types in future, but I think we should leave it at that.

Yes, agreed.  What I implemented weren't cases that were supposed to be
useful to users, only those for which I thought it was good to test
bison with.  Sorry I wasn't clear about this.  Feel free the strip out
(some of?) them, if they aren't useful.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers



view thread (40+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20160405135849.GA254264@alvherre.pgsql>
Permalink:  ../20160405135849.GA254264@alvherre.pgsql/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20160405135849.GA254264@alvherre.pgsql

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, ams@2ndQuadrant.com, david@pgmasters.net, robertmhaas@gmail.com, a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru
  Subject: Re: dealing with extension dependencies that aren't quite 'e'
  In-Reply-To: <20160405135849.GA254264@alvherre.pgsql>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox