pg.ddx.io pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archivehelp / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Julian Markwort <julian.markwort@uni-muenster.de>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Cc: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Cc: Valery Popov <v.popov@postgrespro.ru>
Subject: Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 13:25:24 -0700
Message-ID: <20160720202524.GA16111@fetter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160720181257.GA686053@alvherre.pgsql>
References: <CAB7nPqSL_V+0nD5i-XH_x1o5HTt2bT53vVwPUTHz8YT0hYRoPg@mail.gmail.com>
<20160720181257.GA686053@alvherre.pgsql>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 02:12:57PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Michael Paquier
> > <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > OK, after hacking that for a bit I have finished with option 2 and the
> > > set of PG-like set of routines, the use of USE_SSL in the file
> > > containing all the SHA functions of OpenBSD has proved to be really
> > > ugly, but with a split things are really clear to the eye. The stuff I
> > > got builds on OSX, Linux and MSVC. pgcrypto cannot link directly to
> > > libpgcommon.a, so I am making it compile directly with the source
> > > files, as it is doing on HEAD.
> >
> > Btw, attached is the patch I did for this part if there is any interest in it.
>
> After quickly eyeballing your patch, I agree with the decision of going
> with (2), even if my gut initially told me that (1) would be better
> because it'd require less makefile trickery.
>
> I'm surprised that you say pgcrypto cannot link libpgcommon directly.
> Is there some insurmountable problem there? I notice your MSVC patch
> uses libpgcommon while the Makefile symlinks the files.
People have, in the past, expressed concerns about linking in
pgcrypto. Apparently, in some countries, it's a legal problem.
Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
view thread (149+ messages) latest in thread
Message-ID: <20160720202524.GA16111@fetter.org> Permalink: ../20160720202524.GA16111@fetter.org/ Also on: postgresql.org/message-id/20160720202524.GA16111@fetter.org ·
reply
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options: reply via email To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Cc: david@fetter.org, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, michael.paquier@gmail.com, magnus@hagander.net, peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com, hlinnaka@iki.fi, robertmhaas@gmail.com, julian.markwort@uni-muenster.de, sfrost@snowman.net, david@pgmasters.net, v.popov@postgrespro.ru Subject: Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol In-Reply-To: <20160720202524.GA16111@fetter.org> * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox