pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aleksander Alekseev <a.alekseev@postgrespro.ru>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Subject: Re: [Patch] Temporary tables that do not bloat pg_catalog (a.k.a fast temp tables)
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 13:00:04 +0300
Message-ID: <20160815130004.72effe70@e733> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFj8pRBhsma3YFrTevm1_wvo5V6UbJUj3R1Fbaqni29suVhiHg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20160801124531.66cde374@fujitsu>
	<26c3bc60-6613-e7ab-517a-53136f01fb6c@2ndquadrant.com>
	<13191.1470072250@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20160804151451.6fb87507@fujitsu>
	<CA+Tgmob+AS4vPA-wp+KevL7q+qK4c7yZ5wjGvEv6EqPChE2oYQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+q6zcVLO7VoHHpRn9ExkiWksF6TwJ-rabqgwRJgC2_ci8_UEQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+TgmoYstEXxa0KCAPVAVseTwBpb51t=bK1FBU8L8h4sC3XWBQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<14212.1470595566@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20160815005755.gswdyjfob7dzw4yp@alap3.anarazel.de>
	<20319.1471223097@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20160815010852.5ijua2wm2edzimd4@alap3.anarazel.de>
	<20160815120136.6f9c8dd1@e733>
	<CAFj8pRBhsma3YFrTevm1_wvo5V6UbJUj3R1Fbaqni29suVhiHg@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>

> But we can change this discussion little bit different. I believe so
> solution should be *global temporary tables*. These tables has
> persistent catalogue entries. Data are joined with session. These
> tables can be effective solution of problem with temporary tables,
> can be strong benefit for developers (more comfortable, possible
> static analyse of PLpgSQL) and it simplify life to all people who has
> do migration from Oracle. So only benefits are there :).

I don't think that global temporary tables solve "catalog bloating that
causes auto vacuum" problem. I suggest we don't change a topic. Or maybe
I don't know something about global temporary tables?

-- 
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers



view thread (63+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20160815130004.72effe70@e733>
Permalink:  ../20160815130004.72effe70@e733/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20160815130004.72effe70@e733

 · 

reply
Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: a.alekseev@postgrespro.ru, pavel.stehule@gmail.com, andres@anarazel.de, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, robertmhaas@gmail.com, 9erthalion6@gmail.com, tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com, david@pgmasters.net
  Subject: Re: [Patch] Temporary tables that do not bloat pg_catalog (a.k.a fast temp tables)
  In-Reply-To: <20160815130004.72effe70@e733>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox