From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Christoph Berg <christoph.berg@credativ.de>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: One-shot expanded output in psql using \G
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 08:52:54 -0500
Message-ID: <20170127135254.GE9812@tamriel.snowman.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170127132737.6skslelaf4txs6iw@msg.credativ.de>
References: <20170127132737.6skslelaf4txs6iw@msg.credativ.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>
Christoph,
* Christoph Berg (christoph.berg@credativ.de) wrote:
> The same idea was discussed back in 2008. Back then the outcome was
> that "\x auto" was implemented, but I still think that \G is a useful
> feature to have on its own, and several people in the thread seem to
> have agreed back then.
+1 for my part. I often run a query and then realize that I really
wanted \x output.
Thanks!
Stephen
Attachments:
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 818B) download
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: sfrost@snowman.net, christoph.berg@credativ.de
Subject: Re: One-shot expanded output in psql using \G
In-Reply-To: <20170127135254.GE9812@tamriel.snowman.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox