pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>
Cc: Jaime Casanova <jaime.casanova@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 14:10:01 -0300
Message-ID: <20170131171001.wg7bc4pimfu6in6t@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABOikdNU0qhKE-65x59qaj2kL-Jpq73Ri95ZODAvxxhsEBN9LQ@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>

Pavan Deolasee wrote:

> Two new APIs added.
> 
> - CatalogInsertHeapAndIndex which does a simple_heap_insert followed by
> catalog updates
> - CatalogUpdateHeapAndIndex which does a simple_heap_update followed by
> catalog updates
> 
> There are only a handful callers remain for simple_heap_insert/update after
> this patch. They are typically working with already opened indexes and
> hence I left them unchanged.

Hmm, I was thinking we would get rid of CatalogUpdateIndexes altogether.
Two of the callers are in the new routines (which I propose to rename to
CatalogTupleInsert and CatalogTupleUpdate); the only remaining one is in
InsertPgAttributeTuple.  I propose that we inline the three lines into
all those places and just remove CatalogUpdateIndexes.  Half the out-of-
core places that are using this function will be broken as soon as WARM
lands anyway.  I see no reason to keep it.  (I have already modified the
patch this way -- no need to resend).

Unless there are objections I will push this later this afternoon.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers



view thread (260+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20170131171001.wg7bc4pimfu6in6t@alvherre.pgsql>
Permalink:  ../20170131171001.wg7bc4pimfu6in6t@alvherre.pgsql/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20170131171001.wg7bc4pimfu6in6t@alvherre.pgsql

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, pavan.deolasee@gmail.com, jaime.casanova@2ndquadrant.com, kommi.haribabu@gmail.com, tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com
  Subject: Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)
  In-Reply-To: <20170131171001.wg7bc4pimfu6in6t@alvherre.pgsql>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox