pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: Reducing runtime of stats regression test
Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 10:54:49 -0300
Message-ID: <20170504135449.zepyxepq6ug5pgim@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17795.1493869423@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>

Tom Lane wrote:

> The other significant delay in stats.sql is
> 
> -- force the rate-limiting logic in pgstat_report_stat() to time out
> -- and send a message
> SELECT pg_sleep(1.0);
> 
> Now, we do seem to need a delay there, because the rate-limiting logic
> is unlikely to have permitted the count from the immediately preceding
> statement to have gotten sent right then, and the count won't get
> sent at all while we're inside wait_for_stats (since backends only
> send stats just before going idle).  But there's more than one way
> to skin this cat.  We can just start a new connection with \c, and
> let wait_for_stats wait for the old one to send its stats before quitting.
> Even on my oldest and slowest buildfarm machines, starting a new session
> takes well under one second.

So you changed table prevstats from temp to permanent; perhaps make it
unlogged?

I wonder if it'd be useful to have a "pg_stat_flush" or something, which
sends out whatever is queued in this session.  Then you wouldn't need
the reconnection.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers



view thread (6+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20170504135449.zepyxepq6ug5pgim@alvherre.pgsql>
Permalink:  ../20170504135449.zepyxepq6ug5pgim@alvherre.pgsql/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20170504135449.zepyxepq6ug5pgim@alvherre.pgsql

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
  Subject: Re: Reducing runtime of stats regression test
  In-Reply-To: <20170504135449.zepyxepq6ug5pgim@alvherre.pgsql>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox