From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Cc: Maksim Milyutin <milyutinma@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 00:04:54 -0300
Message-ID: <20171212030454.peiuavv47hhugjfh@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKJS1f_A-whHVYWQYuf-1XAAo_cGEQSg5BuD3FToAAZ1ETptYQ@mail.gmail.com>
David Rowley wrote:
> ATTACH/REPLACE sounds fine. My objection was more about the
> DETACH/ATTACH method to replace an index.
So what happens if you do ALTER INDEX .. ATTACH and you already have
another index in that partition that is attached to the same parent in
the index? With my code, what happens is you have two indexes attached
to the same parent, and you can't drop any. If we don't have DETACH,
how can you get out of that situation?
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com, robertmhaas@gmail.com, simon@2ndquadrant.com, milyutinma@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
In-Reply-To: <20171212030454.peiuavv47hhugjfh@alvherre.pgsql>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox