From: David Gould <daveg@sonic.net>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [patch] BUG #15005: ANALYZE can make pg_class.reltuples inaccurate.
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 20:17:23 -0700
Message-ID: <20180423201723.3e5865ad@engels> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180424010921.GN13438@telsasoft.com>
References: <20180304191918.39e95382@engels>
<20180424010921.GN13438@telsasoft.com>
On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 20:09:21 -0500
Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
> Just want to add for the archive that I happened to run across what appears to
> be a 7-year old report of (I think) both of these vacuum/analyze bugs:
>
> Re: [patch] BUG #15005: ANALYZE can make pg_class.reltuples inaccurate.
> Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM and ANALYZE disagreeing on what reltuples means
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/6373488.29.1323717222303.JavaMail.root%40store1.zcs.ext.w...
Nice find. It does look like both, although, since the info is not in the
thread it is not certain that relpages was large enough to hit the analyze
issue. Unless that was with the old default statistics target in which case
it would be pretty easy to hit.
-dg
--
David Gould daveg@sonic.net
If simplicity worked, the world would be overrun with insects.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: daveg@sonic.net, pryzby@telsasoft.com, tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com
Subject: Re: [patch] BUG #15005: ANALYZE can make pg_class.reltuples inaccurate.
In-Reply-To: <20180423201723.3e5865ad@engels>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox