pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
Cc: Marina Polyakova <m.polyakova@postgrespro.ru>
Cc: Ildus Kurbangaliev <i.kurbangaliev@postgrespro.ru>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP Patch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors
Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 07:58:32 -0300
Message-ID: <20180508105832.6o3uf3npfpjgk5m7@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1805080753290.20512@lancre>

Fabien COELHO wrote:

> I think that I'll have time for a round of review in the first half of July.
> Providing a rebased patch before then would be nice.

Note that even in the absence of a rebased patch, you can apply to an
older checkout if you have some limited window of time for a review.

Looking over the diff, I find that this patch tries to do too much and
needs to be split up.  At a minimum there is a preliminary patch that
introduces the error reporting stuff (errstart etc); there are other
thread-related changes (for example to the random generation functions)
that probably belong in a separate one too.  Not sure if there are other
smaller patches hidden inside the rest.

On elog/errstart: we already have a convention for what ereport() calls
look like; I suggest to use that instead of inventing your own.  With
that, is there a need for elog()?  In the backend we have it because
$HISTORY but there's no need for that here -- I propose to lose elog()
and use only ereport everywhere.  Also, I don't see that you need
errmsg_internal() at all; let's lose it too.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services




view thread (137+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20180508105832.6o3uf3npfpjgk5m7@alvherre.pgsql>
Permalink:  ../20180508105832.6o3uf3npfpjgk5m7@alvherre.pgsql/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20180508105832.6o3uf3npfpjgk5m7@alvherre.pgsql

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, coelho@cri.ensmp.fr, m.polyakova@postgrespro.ru, i.kurbangaliev@postgrespro.ru, teodor@sigaev.ru
  Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP Patch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors
  In-Reply-To: <20180508105832.6o3uf3npfpjgk5m7@alvherre.pgsql>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox