From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Cc: tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com
Cc: andres@anarazel.de
Cc: robertmhaas@gmail.com
Cc: michael.paquier@gmail.com
Cc: david@pgmasters.net
Cc: Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com
Cc: craig@2ndquadrant.com
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
Subject: Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 21:50:36 -0400
Message-ID: <20180703015036.3ifklp6sc26xuuey@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d01c4037-0740-c739-e340-5aa1119c0afd@2ndQuadrant.com>
On 2018-Jul-02, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Andres suggested back in March (and again privately to me) that given how
> much this has changed from the original this CF item should be marked
> Returned With Feedback and the current patchset submitted as a new item.
>
> Does anyone object to that course of action?
If doing that makes the "CF count" reset back to one for the new
submission, then I object to that course of action. If we really
think this item does not belong into this commitfest, lets punt it to
the next one. However, it seems rather strange to do so this early in
the cycle. Is there really no small item that could be cherry-picked
from this series to be committed standalone?
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com, horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com, andres@anarazel.de, robertmhaas@gmail.com, michael.paquier@gmail.com, david@pgmasters.net, Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com, craig@2ndquadrant.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
Subject: Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries
In-Reply-To: <20180703015036.3ifklp6sc26xuuey@alvherre.pgsql>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox