pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: CVE-2017-7484-induced bugs, or, btree cmp functions are not leakproof?
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 18:44:21 -0400
Message-ID: <20180710224421.lnuq3aavioc7na2r@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3876.1531261875@sss.pgh.pa.us>

On 2018-Jul-10, Tom Lane wrote:

> I propose to run through the system operator classes, find any for which
> the comparison function isn't marked leakproof but the operators are,
> and fix them.  This is clearly appropriate for HEAD and maybe it's not
> too late to force an initdb for v11 --- thoughts?

on initdb in v11, see
https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f9cqoSKS9JVcBKGa2mdn-24YPWc9XLzFDNsmjJMUpth1w@mail.gmail.com

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services




view thread (37+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20180710224421.lnuq3aavioc7na2r@alvherre.pgsql>
Permalink:  ../20180710224421.lnuq3aavioc7na2r@alvherre.pgsql/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20180710224421.lnuq3aavioc7na2r@alvherre.pgsql

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: CVE-2017-7484-induced bugs, or, btree cmp functions are not leakproof?
  In-Reply-To: <20180710224421.lnuq3aavioc7na2r@alvherre.pgsql>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox