From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Cc: Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2019 10:33:12 +0900
Message-ID: <20190119013312.GC3306@paquier.xyz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57479e55-ce26-5c00-2525-09e267c7224a@2ndquadrant.com>
References: <201901161759.voovsk55ofe7@alvherre.pgsql>
<57479e55-ce26-5c00-2525-09e267c7224a@2ndquadrant.com>
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 07:58:06PM +0100, Vik Fearing wrote:
> My vote is to have homogeneous syntax for all of this, and so put it in
> parentheses, but we should also allow CREATE INDEX and DROP INDEX to use
> parentheses for it, too.
That would be a new thing as these variants don't exist yet, and WITH
is for storage parameters. In my opinion, the long-term take on doing
such things is that we are then able to reduce the number of reserved
keywords in the grammar. Even if for the case of CONCURRENTLY we may
see humans on Mars before this actually happens, this does not mean
that we should not do it moving forward for other keywords in the
grammar.
--
Michael
Attachments:
[application/pgp-signature] signature.asc (832B, ../20190119013312.GC3306@paquier.xyz/2-signature.asc)
download
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: michael@paquier.xyz, vik.fearing@2ndquadrant.com, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, sk@zsrv.org, peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com, michael.paquier@gmail.com, andreas@proxel.se, sfrost@snowman.net, craig@2ndquadrant.com
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0
In-Reply-To: <20190119013312.GC3306@paquier.xyz>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox