From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Subject: Re: propagating replica identity to partitions
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 11:55:47 +0900
Message-ID: <20190301025547.GI1348@paquier.xyz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190228224111.GA24086@alvherre.pgsql>
References: <CA+TgmoYjksObOzY8b1U1=BsP_m+702eOf42fqRtQTYio1NunbA@mail.gmail.com>
<20190228224111.GA24086@alvherre.pgsql>
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 07:41:11PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> We all seem to agree that REPLICA IDENTITY should recurse.
(entering the ring)
FWIW, I agree that having REPLICA IDENTITY recurse on partitions feels
more natural, as much as being able to use ALTER TABLE ONLY to only
update the definition on a given partition member.
--
Michael
Attachments:
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 832B) download
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: michael@paquier.xyz, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, robertmhaas@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com
Subject: Re: propagating replica identity to partitions
In-Reply-To: <20190301025547.GI1348@paquier.xyz>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox