pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: CREATE OR REPLACE AGGREGATE?
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2019 18:14:10 +0900
Message-ID: <20190317091410.GD3357@paquier.xyz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8736nm55gv.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk>
References: <8736nm55gv.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk>

On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 07:35:16AM +0000, Andrew Gierth wrote:
> I took a bash at actually writing it and didn't see any obvious problems
> (I'll post the patch in a bit). Is there some reason (other than
> shortage of round tuits) why this might not be a good idea, or why it
> hasn't been done before?

Indeed.  There is not much on the matter in pgsql-hackers as far as I
can see, except that but the thread is short:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAGYyBgj3u_4mfTNPMnpOM2NPtWQVPU4WRsYz=RLCF59g-kGVmQ@mail.gmail...
--
Michael

Attachments:

  signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 832B) download

view thread (4+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20190317091410.GD3357@paquier.xyz>
Permalink:  ../20190317091410.GD3357@paquier.xyz/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20190317091410.GD3357@paquier.xyz

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: michael@paquier.xyz, andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: CREATE OR REPLACE AGGREGATE?
  In-Reply-To: <20190317091410.GD3357@paquier.xyz>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox