From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: propagating replica identity to partitions
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 13:46:33 -0300
Message-ID: <20190328164633.GA22571@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190323013354.GI20584@paquier.xyz> <806fd173-9084-5fb8-ed78-25398ab9e92f@2ndquadrant.com>
Thanks, Michael and Peter, for responding; however there is a second
part to the question, which is "should I change the recursivity of
REPLICA IDENTITY, while not simultaneously changing the recusivity of
the TABLESPACE and OWNER TO forms of ALTER TABLE?"
I think everyone agrees that REPLICA IDENTITY should be changed. The
question is whether it's bad behavior from my part to change it
separately from changing every other non-currently-recursive form.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com, michael@paquier.xyz, robertmhaas@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: propagating replica identity to partitions
In-Reply-To: <20190328164633.GA22571@alvherre.pgsql>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox