pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: andres@anarazel.de
Cc: a.zakirov@postgrespro.ru
Cc: alvherre@2ndquadrant.com
Cc: ah@cybertec.at
Cc: magnus@hagander.net
Cc: robertmhaas@gmail.com
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: shared-memory based stats collector
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 11:13:27 +0200
Message-ID: <20190410091327.fpnvjbuu74dzxizl@development> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190410.093929.123264423.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
References: <20190403195659.fcmk2i7ruxhtyqjl@alap3.anarazel.de>
	<20190404.092512.142064795.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
	<20190409150333.5iashyjxm5jmraml@development>
	<20190410.093929.123264423.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>

On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 09:39:29AM +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
>At Tue, 9 Apr 2019 17:03:33 +0200, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote in <20190409150333.5iashyjxm5jmraml@development>
>> Unfortunately, now that we're past code freeze it's clear this is a
>> PG12
>> matter now :-(
>>
>> I personally consider this to be very worthwhile & beneficial
>> improvement,
>> but I agree with Andres the patch did not quite get to committable
>> state
>> in the last CF. Conidering how sensitive part it touches, I suggest we
>> try
>> to get it committed early in the PG13 cycle. I'm willing to spend some
>> time on doing test/benchmarks and reviewing the code, if needed.
>
>I'm very happy to be told that. Actually the code was a rush work
>(mainly for reverting refactoring) and left some stupid
>mistakes. I'm going through on the patch again and polish code.
>

While reviewing the patch I've always had issue with evaluating how it
behaves for various scenarios / workloads. The reviews generally did one
specific benchmark, but I find that unsatisfactory. I wonder whether if
we could develop a small set of more comprehensive workloads for this
patch (i.e. different numbers of objects, access patterns, ...).

regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services 





view thread (238+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20190410091327.fpnvjbuu74dzxizl@development>
Permalink:  ../20190410091327.fpnvjbuu74dzxizl@development/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20190410091327.fpnvjbuu74dzxizl@development

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com, horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp, andres@anarazel.de, a.zakirov@postgrespro.ru, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, ah@cybertec.at, magnus@hagander.net, robertmhaas@gmail.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
  Subject: Re: shared-memory based stats collector
  In-Reply-To: <20190410091327.fpnvjbuu74dzxizl@development>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox