From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: clean up docs for v12
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 12:17:22 -0500
Message-ID: <20190426171722.GB3925@telsasoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190423025042.GI2712@paquier.xyz>
References: <20190422160807.xmdhtrtpowkjmyfd@alap3.anarazel.de>
<20190422161955.GA17411@alvherre.pgsql>
<20190423025042.GI2712@paquier.xyz>
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 11:50:42AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 12:19:55PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > On 2019-Apr-22, Andres Freund wrote:
> >> I think it'd be better just to fix s/the all/that all/.
> >
> > (and s/if's/if it's/)
>
> FWIW, I have noticed that part when gathering all the pieces for what
> became 148266f, still the full paragraph was sort of confusing, so I
> have just fixed the most obvious issues reported first.
I saw you closed the item here:
https://wiki.postgresql.org/index.php?title=PostgreSQL_12_Open_Items&diff=33390&oldid=33389
But I think the biggest part of the patch is still not even reviewed ?
I'm referring to ./*review-docs-for-pg12dev.patch
I haven't updated the JIT changes since there's larger discussion regarding the
code.
Justin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: pryzby@telsasoft.com, michael@paquier.xyz, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, andres@anarazel.de
Subject: Re: clean up docs for v12
In-Reply-To: <20190426171722.GB3925@telsasoft.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox