pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Inconsistent error message wording for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 23:29:37 -0400
Message-ID: <20190620032936.GA28895@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190527080235.GA25901@paquier.xyz>

On 2019-May-27, Michael Paquier wrote:

> On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 12:20:58AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> > I notice your patch changes "catalog relations" to "system catalogs".
> > I think we predominantly prefer the latter, so that part of your change
> > seems OK.  (In passing, I noticed we have a couple of places using
> > "system catalog tables", which is weird.)
> 
> Good point.  These are not new though, so I would prefer not touch
> those parts for this patch.

Sure.

> > We do have "is not yet implemented" in a
> > couple of other places, so all things considered I'm not so sure about
> > changing that one to "cannot".
> 
> Okay.  I can live with this difference.  Not changing the string in
> ReindexRelationConcurrently() has the merit to be consistent with the
> existing ones in reindex_relation() and ReindexPartitionedIndex().
> Please find attached an updated version.  What do you think?

Looks good.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services





view thread (23+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20190620032936.GA28895@alvherre.pgsql>
Permalink:  ../20190620032936.GA28895@alvherre.pgsql/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20190620032936.GA28895@alvherre.pgsql

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, michael@paquier.xyz, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: Inconsistent error message wording for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
  In-Reply-To: <20190620032936.GA28895@alvherre.pgsql>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox